<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>International Journal of Public Opinion Research - recent issues</title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>International Journal of Public Opinion Research - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1471-6909</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Public Opinion Research</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0954-2892</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/293?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/362?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/368?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/384?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/390?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/396?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/137?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/139?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/165?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/204?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/224?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/235?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/251?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/25?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/47?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/65?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/98?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/122?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/135?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial: Comparative Survey Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, T. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial: Comparative Survey Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring the Quality of Real-Time Telephone Survey Interpreters]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Real-time interpretation during a survey can expand the number of languages in which surveys are offered. There are questions, however, about the quality of the interpretation process given that the interview is typically not pretranslated. A detailed assessment of the quality of this approach is provided using behavior-coding of interviews conducted with respondents who otherwise would have been finalized as "language barrier nonrespondents." Interviews were recorded and behavior-coded, quantifying for each question, (1) the accuracy of the interpretation of the question, (2) the accuracy of the interpreted response, (3) the degree of difficulty administering the question, (4) the number of times the question needed to be repeated, and (5) the number of times the interpreter and respondent engaged in dialogue that was not relayed to the interviewer. The approach produced favorable results, with less than a 4 percent error rate for interpretation of the questions and a 1.4 percent error rate in interpretation of survey responses.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Link, M. W., Battaglia, M. P., Osborn, L., Frankel, M. R., Mokdad, A. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring the Quality of Real-Time Telephone Survey Interpreters]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/293?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-national Comparability of Survey Attitude Measures]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/293?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Many international surveys include batteries of questions which are combined to form scales by secondary analysts who often treat these scales as unproblematic. However, to be able to make valid cross-national comparisons of values on scales such as these, we need to be sure that the variations genuinely reflect differences in populations rather than being due to various forms of error. In order to illustrate the kinds of problems that can occur, and to explore ways of dealing with them, we examine items from the 2003 ISSP module on national identity. We show that differences between countries in response rates and other features of survey design are associated with the substantive outcomes and that ignoring these methodological problems will affect the validity of cross-national comparisons. We also examine whether the items can be assumed to have equivalence of meaning across the different countries in terms of their contributions to measuring two dimensions of national identity: civic and ethnic. We conclude that certain items do not seem to have the same meaning in all countries, thus jeopardizing the validity of cross-national comparisons using these scales. We suggest that the methods used and the lessons to be learnt can be applied to other items and cross-national datasets.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heath, A., Martin, J., Spreckelsen, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-national Comparability of Survey Attitude Measures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/316?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Events and Reliability of Measures: The Effect of Elections on Measures of Interest in Politics]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/316?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article aims to determine whether elections affect the level of interest in politics. The European Social Survey's (ESS) long fieldwork periods make it possible to compare the change in levels of interest in politics as election time approaches and campaigns intensify, or as elections pass and the attention of the public turns toward other issues. The scope and comparability of the ESS allows for seeing possible effects on a cross-national level. The distance from the last parliamentary election and the distance to the next election are calculated for all cases in the database. The distance is then compared with the change of levels in variables measuring interest in politics throughout the fieldwork period. Additionally, changes in the mean values for each fieldwork month in countries where the ESS was fielded during elections is also compared. Results show that the distance from the last election and the distance to the next election are not correlated with a change in the levels of interest in politics. Furthermore, changes in the mean levels of interest in politics are within the error margins for fieldwork months that coincided with election months.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solvak, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Events and Reliability of Measures: The Effect of Elections on Measures of Interest in Politics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measurement Models Matter: Implicit Assumptions and Cross-national Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The availability of cross-national survey data has grown exponentially in recent years. While much attention has been paid to increasing the comparability of indicators across countries, less has been done to increase the comparability of measurement models. This article examines the implicit assumptions of four different approaches to measurement modeling&mdash;summative scales, pooled exploratory factor analysis, multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis, and locally-conditioned factor analysis, and explores whether substantive conclusions in cross-national work can vary depending on the choice of measurement model. We find that results can vary by method and suggest that (i) the measurement modeling process itself be a critical part of cross-national research, and (ii) analysts be prepared to fully explain and defend measurement modeling decisions. A thorough understanding of the implicit assumptions of measurement modeling is required to avoid drawing conclusions that are little more than arbitrary.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medina, T. R., Smith, S. N., Long, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measurement Models Matter: Implicit Assumptions and Cross-national Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>361</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/362?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gender-Role Egalitarianism--Is the Trend Reversal Real?]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/362?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Braun, M., Scott, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gender-Role Egalitarianism--Is the Trend Reversal Real?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>367</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>362</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/368?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validity of Borrowed Questionnaire Items: A Cross-Cultural Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/368?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In support of a country-wide educational reform, the Supreme Education Council created the Qatar National Education Database System. We describe this system and use analytic techniques to tentatively evaluate some aspects of the quality of its scaled attitudinal information. In particular, we stress the importance of developing criteria for ensuring the validity of "borrowed" measures. We also point to the desirability of longitudinal data quality research in the context of a culture in which measurement instruments such as questionnaires have gone from little or no use to a newly familiar feature of the educational landscape.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amer, S. R., Ingels, S. J., Mohammed, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validity of Borrowed Questionnaire Items: A Cross-Cultural Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>375</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>368</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Michael Wolffsohn and Thomas Brechenmacher (2008). Deutschland, judisch Heimatland. Die Geschichte der deutschen Juden vom Kaiserreich bis heute]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petersen, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Michael Wolffsohn and Thomas Brechenmacher (2008). Deutschland, judisch Heimatland. Die Geschichte der deutschen Juden vom Kaiserreich bis heute]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>379</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nicholas J. G. Winter (2008). Dangerous Frames. How Ideas About Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion.]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hancock, A.-M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nicholas J. G. Winter (2008). Dangerous Frames. How Ideas About Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>383</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/384?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/384?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Boer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>389</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>384</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/390?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/390?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mortimore, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>394</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>390</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[WAPOR News]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[WAPOR News]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>395</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>WAPOR News</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/396?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frame Flow Between Government and the News Media and its Effects on the Public: Framing of North Korea]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/396?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, J., Seo, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frame Flow Between Government and the News Media and its Effects on the Public: Framing of North Korea]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>396</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>396</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrigendum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/137?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/137?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donsbach, W., Neijens, P., Traugott, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:07 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>138</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>137</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/139?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/139?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The integration of formerly isolated theoretical concepts is probably one of the most challenging tasks in the development of media effects theory. While agenda setting has already been linked to priming and framing via the concept of second level agenda-setting, this article takes a closer look into perceptual phenomena within the agenda-setting process, thus linking micro-level psychological theories with macro-level theories of political communication. Starting with third-person perceptions, we argue that part of the agenda-setting function of the mass media is to inform recipients what <I>other people</I> believe to be important. Along these lines of thought, a theoretical model of agenda-setting effects is outlined in which perceptual components play an important role in the conceived process of media influence.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huck, I., Quiring, O., Brosius, H.-B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:07 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceptual Phenomena in the Agenda Setting Process]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>164</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/165?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stratification and Global Elite Theory: A Cross-Cultural and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Opinion]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/165?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Many scholars have argued that globalization involves the emergence of a global elite, who are attached more to supra-national identities than others, who remain more local. Two variants of the global elite can be found in the literature: cosmopolitan and capitalist. This literature suggests more broadly that cross-nationally stratification has a consistent influence on attitudes pertinent to globalization such as support for global economic institutions. Using a social stratification approach, we examined nine developed societies from the World Values Survey to test whether stratification is related to attitudes towards globalization, and find only modest support for the contention that the upper strata become more cosmopolitan and more capitalist, or in a word, more global. The evidence suggests that the attitudinal globalization of the upper strata in developed economies is temporary and does not occur simultaneously in all countries, and that it does not increase consistently over time.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davidson, R., Poor, N., Williams, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:07 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stratification and Global Elite Theory: A Cross-Cultural and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Opinion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>186</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>165</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Reflective Cue: Prompting Citizens for Greater Consideration of Reasons]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This research explores means by which news media may help promote public awareness and consideration of reasons for supporting differing perspectives on public issues. The study draws on the concept argument repertoire (Cappella <I>et al.</I>, 2002) and recent work on citizens&rsquo; exposure to diverse issue positions and rationales (Mutz, <cross-ref type="bib" refid="B32">2006</cross-ref>). Merging scholarship in political psychology and information processing, the study introduces the reflective cue&mdash;a contextual cue designed to fit news media formats and induce more systematic processing of news. A controlled experiment (<I>n</I> = 265) documents support for the study's predictions that the exposure to the reflective cue in news would have positive effects on information-processing behavior and cognitive orientations related to the role of informed citizenry and media in democracy. Interestingly, exposure to the cue did not enhance subjects&rsquo; expression of issue-position reasons. I discuss possible explanations and implications of the findings, and offer directions for future.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manosevitch, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Reflective Cue: Prompting Citizens for Greater Consideration of Reasons]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>203</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/204?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frame Flow between Government and the News Media and its Effects on the Public: Framing of North Korea]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/204?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Public opinion is likely to be susceptible to the way a government and the news media frame foreign countries, because unlike domestic issues, foreign news is typically beyond a person's direct experience. How does the American public respond to foreign news when its government and the news media promote competing frames and change their prominence according to the relations between the U.S. and that foreign country? The present study shows this frame building and frame effects by using a public opinion poll and content analysis of U.S. policy statements and media coverage. North Korea was chosen because its visibility to the American public has increased since President George W. Bush designated it as one of the countries in the "axis of evil". The results show that during a four-month period, the U.S. government and the newspaper produced three competing frames, and that the magnitude of the frames shifted as U.S.&ndash;North Korean relationships shifted. These shifts in turn made the American public choose economic sanctions over military solutions toward the country.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, J., Seo, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frame Flow between Government and the News Media and its Effects on the Public: Framing of North Korea]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>223</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/224?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Application of the Estimated Dependent Variable Approach: Trade Union Members' Support for Active Labor Market Policies and Insider-Outsider Politics]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/224?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Application of the Estimated Dependent Variable Approach: Trade Union Members' Support for Active Labor Market Policies and Insider-Outsider Politics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>234</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>224</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/235?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Effect of Phrasing Scale Items in Low-Brow or High-Brow Language on Responses]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/235?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The wording of questions is a crucial problem in questionnaire construction. We posit that the semantic meanings of single words or short statements may differ among respondents, their interpretations and, accordingly, the responses may vary among respondents. This assumption is tested in a representative survey among residents in a deprived area in Cologne, Germany, using a scale on "Perceived Neighbourhood Disorder" introduced by Ross and Mirowski (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="B30">1999</cross-ref>). In the translated German version of the scale, we used a split-half design, varying the phrasing of eight of the eleven items by using (a) low-brow (or everyday) or (b) high-brow (or elaborated) language. Besides testing the assumption that phrasing has an effect, we wished to explore the kind of effect it has on respondents of different socio-economic characteristics such as age and education, and also attitudinal variables. The results support our assumptions: phrasing has an effect, since answers and scale means differ significantly. Results of multivariate analyses suggest that the low-brow language version is the more appropriate way for item wording.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blasius, J., Friedrichs, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Effect of Phrasing Scale Items in Low-Brow or High-Brow Language on Responses]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>235</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ralph Negrine (2008). The Transformation of Political Communication. Continuities and Changes in media and politics.]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louw, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ralph Negrine (2008). The Transformation of Political Communication. Continuities and Changes in media and politics.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>251</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/251?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beverley A. Searle (2008). Well-being: In Search of a Good Life?]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/251?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breznau, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beverley A. Searle (2008). Well-being: In Search of a Good Life?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Boer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>260</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mortimore, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[WAPOR News]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/2/266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:10:08 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[WAPOR News]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>266</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>WAPOR News</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donsbach, W., Neijens, P., Traugott, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:23 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Lost Decade? Laszlo Radvanyi and the Origins of Public Opinion Research in Mexico, 1941-1952]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article documents public opinion research activities in Mexico in the 1940s and the role played by Hungarian professor L&aacute;szl&oacute; Radv&aacute;nyi, who immigrated to that country at the height of World War II. Our research relies on several of Radv&aacute;nyi's publications archived in different countries, as well as on interviews with family, acquaintances, and experts on the work of his wife, the German poet Anna Seghers. During his years in Mexico, Radv&aacute;nyi founded the Scientific Institute of Mexican Public Opinion, in 1941, and the <I>International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research</I>, in 1947&mdash;a forefather of today's IJPOR. He was also a founding member of WAPOR. His early "sample surveys" raised important methodological issues and recorded opinion results that reflect the vibrant times of war and policy making in a modernizing country. However, Radv&aacute;nyi's contribution to the profession has been virtually forgotten. Until now, accounts about how public opinion research began in Mexico either ignored Radv&aacute;nyi's works or reduced his ten years of survey research to a single footnote. This article is an attempt to fill this enormous omission and highlight some of Radv&aacute;nyi's contributions to these early stages of survey research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreno, A., Sanchez-Castro, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:23 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Lost Decade? Laszlo Radvanyi and the Origins of Public Opinion Research in Mexico, 1941-1952]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>24</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/25?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/25?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study draws on a sample of participants in online groups to analyze the interaction between individual-level and communicative-level factors that affect public opinion perception. We first assess the association between individual views on several issues&mdash;the death penalty, gun regulation and teaching morality in public schools&mdash;and false consensus, i.e., the tendency to attribute own views to others. We also examine whether the association between individual opinion and false consensus is mitigated by perceived disagreement with offline discussion networks and with participants in online discussion groups. As expected, not only is there a correlation between personal and perceived opinion, but also those who strongly favor the three policies estimate public support to be higher than do those who are unfavorable or moderate. Multivariate models further show that encountering disagreement, online or offline, attenuates the association between the individual opinion and false consensus. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wojcieszak, M., Price, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:23 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/47?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Political Consequences of Ambivalence: The Case of Democratic Reform in Hong Kong]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/47?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Recent research has shown that attitudinal ambivalence has important implications on political attitudes and behavior. The concept holds one of the keys to understanding complicated and seemingly contradictory opinions of the public. This article examines ambivalence in public opinion regarding democratic reform in Hong Kong. Analysis of a representative survey (<I>N</I> = 600) shows that common citizens indeed have a significant degree of ambivalence toward the government's political reform bill proposed in 2005. Regarding consequences, objective ambivalence is shown to have greater predictive power than subjective ambivalence. The former relates negatively to attitude extremity and weakens the attitude&ndash;behavior linkage. However, contrary to the usual finding in the literature, objective ambivalence also relates positively to protest participation intention. The theoretical and social implications of the findings are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, F. L. F., Chan, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:23 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edn053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Political Consequences of Ambivalence: The Case of Democratic Reform in Hong Kong]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/65?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Asking for Numbers and Quantities: Visual Design Effects in Paper&Pencil Surveys]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/65?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>When reporting frequencies and quantities in self-administered surveys using open-ended questions, respondents make use of estimation strategies in order to provide a reasonable response. Accordingly, respondents do not only report pure numbers using digits, instead they extend their response to alphanumeric information and explicit estimates (e.g. "about 10&ndash;20 cigarettes per day"). Such responses are not only of reduced quality, but they also require a lot of editing and cleaning in the post-field phase of a survey. While previous methodological work on frequency questions has focused on question wording, reference periods and other text elements that have traditionally been considered significant for high quality frequency responses, in this article we test the impact of various graphical characteristics of the response field in order to reduce the number of alphanumeric elaborations and explicit estimates. The field-experimental studies reported are based on the assumption that respondents interpret formal characteristics of frequency questions as meaningful information throughout the question answer process. The findings reported will help survey designers reduce the proportion of estimated responses.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuchs, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Asking for Numbers and Quantities: Visual Design Effects in Paper&Pencil Surveys]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intergroup Attitudes and Policy Support: How Prejudice against Minority Groups Affects Support for Public Policies]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David, C. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intergroup Attitudes and Policy Support: How Prejudice against Minority Groups Affects Support for Public Policies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>97</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/98?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Support for Mothers' Employment at Home: Conflict between Work and Family]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/98?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelley, S. M. C., Kelley, C. G. E., Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Support for Mothers' Employment at Home: Conflict between Work and Family]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>110</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys: An Experimental Investigation of Data Quality and Social Desirability Effects]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heerwegh, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edn054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys: An Experimental Investigation of Data Quality and Social Desirability Effects]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>121</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/122?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rosalee A. Clawson and Zoe M. Oxley (2008). Public Opinion: Democratic Ideals, Democratic Practice.]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/122?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elenbaas, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rosalee A. Clawson and Zoe M. Oxley (2008). Public Opinion: Democratic Ideals, Democratic Practice.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>124</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>122</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/125?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/125?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Boer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>125</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mortimore, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>134</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/135?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[WAPOR News]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/1/135?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:01:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[WAPOR News]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>135</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>WAPOR News</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>