<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>International Journal of Public Opinion Research - current issue</title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>International Journal of Public Opinion Research - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1471-6909</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Autumn 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>International Journal of Public Opinion Research</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0954-2892</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/267?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/293?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/362?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/368?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/376?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/384?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/390?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/396?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/267?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial: Comparative Survey Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/267?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, T. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial: Comparative Survey Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>267</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring the Quality of Real-Time Telephone Survey Interpreters]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Real-time interpretation during a survey can expand the number of languages in which surveys are offered. There are questions, however, about the quality of the interpretation process given that the interview is typically not pretranslated. A detailed assessment of the quality of this approach is provided using behavior-coding of interviews conducted with respondents who otherwise would have been finalized as "language barrier nonrespondents." Interviews were recorded and behavior-coded, quantifying for each question, (1) the accuracy of the interpretation of the question, (2) the accuracy of the interpreted response, (3) the degree of difficulty administering the question, (4) the number of times the question needed to be repeated, and (5) the number of times the interpreter and respondent engaged in dialogue that was not relayed to the interviewer. The approach produced favorable results, with less than a 4 percent error rate for interpretation of the questions and a 1.4 percent error rate in interpretation of survey responses.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Link, M. W., Battaglia, M. P., Osborn, L., Frankel, M. R., Mokdad, A. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring the Quality of Real-Time Telephone Survey Interpreters]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/293?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cross-national Comparability of Survey Attitude Measures]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/293?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Many international surveys include batteries of questions which are combined to form scales by secondary analysts who often treat these scales as unproblematic. However, to be able to make valid cross-national comparisons of values on scales such as these, we need to be sure that the variations genuinely reflect differences in populations rather than being due to various forms of error. In order to illustrate the kinds of problems that can occur, and to explore ways of dealing with them, we examine items from the 2003 ISSP module on national identity. We show that differences between countries in response rates and other features of survey design are associated with the substantive outcomes and that ignoring these methodological problems will affect the validity of cross-national comparisons. We also examine whether the items can be assumed to have equivalence of meaning across the different countries in terms of their contributions to measuring two dimensions of national identity: civic and ethnic. We conclude that certain items do not seem to have the same meaning in all countries, thus jeopardizing the validity of cross-national comparisons using these scales. We suggest that the methods used and the lessons to be learnt can be applied to other items and cross-national datasets.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heath, A., Martin, J., Spreckelsen, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cross-national Comparability of Survey Attitude Measures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>293</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/316?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Events and Reliability of Measures: The Effect of Elections on Measures of Interest in Politics]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/316?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article aims to determine whether elections affect the level of interest in politics. The European Social Survey's (ESS) long fieldwork periods make it possible to compare the change in levels of interest in politics as election time approaches and campaigns intensify, or as elections pass and the attention of the public turns toward other issues. The scope and comparability of the ESS allows for seeing possible effects on a cross-national level. The distance from the last parliamentary election and the distance to the next election are calculated for all cases in the database. The distance is then compared with the change of levels in variables measuring interest in politics throughout the fieldwork period. Additionally, changes in the mean values for each fieldwork month in countries where the ESS was fielded during elections is also compared. Results show that the distance from the last election and the distance to the next election are not correlated with a change in the levels of interest in politics. Furthermore, changes in the mean levels of interest in politics are within the error margins for fieldwork months that coincided with election months.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solvak, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Events and Reliability of Measures: The Effect of Elections on Measures of Interest in Politics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measurement Models Matter: Implicit Assumptions and Cross-national Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The availability of cross-national survey data has grown exponentially in recent years. While much attention has been paid to increasing the comparability of indicators across countries, less has been done to increase the comparability of measurement models. This article examines the implicit assumptions of four different approaches to measurement modeling&mdash;summative scales, pooled exploratory factor analysis, multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis, and locally-conditioned factor analysis, and explores whether substantive conclusions in cross-national work can vary depending on the choice of measurement model. We find that results can vary by method and suggest that (i) the measurement modeling process itself be a critical part of cross-national research, and (ii) analysts be prepared to fully explain and defend measurement modeling decisions. A thorough understanding of the implicit assumptions of measurement modeling is required to avoid drawing conclusions that are little more than arbitrary.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medina, T. R., Smith, S. N., Long, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measurement Models Matter: Implicit Assumptions and Cross-national Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>361</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/362?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gender-Role Egalitarianism--Is the Trend Reversal Real?]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/362?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Braun, M., Scott, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gender-Role Egalitarianism--Is the Trend Reversal Real?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>367</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>362</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/368?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validity of Borrowed Questionnaire Items: A Cross-Cultural Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/368?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In support of a country-wide educational reform, the Supreme Education Council created the Qatar National Education Database System. We describe this system and use analytic techniques to tentatively evaluate some aspects of the quality of its scaled attitudinal information. In particular, we stress the importance of developing criteria for ensuring the validity of "borrowed" measures. We also point to the desirability of longitudinal data quality research in the context of a culture in which measurement instruments such as questionnaires have gone from little or no use to a newly familiar feature of the educational landscape.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amer, S. R., Ingels, S. J., Mohammed, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validity of Borrowed Questionnaire Items: A Cross-Cultural Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>375</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>368</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Notes</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/376?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Michael Wolffsohn and Thomas Brechenmacher (2008). Deutschland, judisch Heimatland. Die Geschichte der deutschen Juden vom Kaiserreich bis heute]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/376?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petersen, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Michael Wolffsohn and Thomas Brechenmacher (2008). Deutschland, judisch Heimatland. Die Geschichte der deutschen Juden vom Kaiserreich bis heute]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>379</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>376</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nicholas J. G. Winter (2008). Dangerous Frames. How Ideas About Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion.]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hancock, A.-M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nicholas J. G. Winter (2008). Dangerous Frames. How Ideas About Race and Gender Shape Public Opinion.]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>383</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/384?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/384?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Boer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>389</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>384</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/390?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/390?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mortimore, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>394</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>390</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[WAPOR News]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[WAPOR News]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>395</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>WAPOR News</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/396?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frame Flow Between Government and the News Media and its Effects on the Public: Framing of North Korea]]></title>
<link>http://ijpor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/21/3/396?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lim, J., Seo, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:27:22 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/ijpor/edp041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frame Flow Between Government and the News Media and its Effects on the Public: Framing of North Korea]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>World Association for Public Opinion Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>396</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>396</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Corrigendum</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>