International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access published online on February 17, 2005
International Journal of Public Opinion Research, doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh068
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Assistant Professor of Communication at the University of Pittsburgh
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Though not as well-known as other of his writings, Robert K. Mertons communications research represents an important body of work. From 1941, when he first joined forces with Paul Lazarsfeld at Columbia University, through 1949, when he published his last articles in the area, Merton was active in the overlapping fields of propaganda, public opinion, and communications research. He codified methods, formulated middle range concepts, and composed a small but distinctive corpus that remains useful for contemporary study. Borrowing one of Mertons own concepts, this essay argues that his communications research was serendipitous--an unplanned, surprising, but highly productive episode in his nine-decade life of learning. Not only was communications research the vehicle through which he and Lazarsfeld initially forged their famous partnership, it also helped Merton advance his own sociological thinking and yielded some of the best work on mass media published before 1950. Following the logic of the idea of serendipity, I trace the development of Mertons communications research from his unplanned preparation in the s, through the structured opportunity he ambivalently embraced working with Lazarsfeld during the war, and on to some of the more significant consequences that followed.
Received October 12, 2004
Article
The Serendipity of Mertons Communications Research
Peter Simonson, E-mail: simonson{at}pitt.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Pooley Fifteen Pages that Shook the Field: Personal Influence, Edward Shils, and the Remembered History of Mass Communication Research The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November 1, 2006; 608(1): 130 - 156. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
