Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Park, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 World Association for Public Opinion Research

REFERENCE GROUPS, OPINION INTENSITY, AND PUBLIC OPINION EXPRESSION

Carroll J. Glynn, Associate Professor and Eunkyung Park

Department Chair, Cornell University.
Department of Communication, Cornell University.

Correspondence should be addressed to Carroll Glynn at Department of Communication, 336 Kennedy Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

Abstract

Noelle-Neumann's work on the spiral of silence (1974, 1977, 1984) has been one of the most significant theoretical developments in public opinion research of the past quarter-century. The theory is well known among public opinion researchers, and a number of research efforts have been directed toward examining specific parts of the theory. However, the theory is difficult to test, incorporating psychological, social-psychological and sociological variables, including psychological variables and sweeping changes in the social climate of opinion (cf. Noelle-Neumann 1984).

This study investigated the role of opinion thresholds, social groups and weighing of others' opinions in opinion expression. Using Krassa's (1988) computer simulation and modifications of Noelle-Neumann's (1974) spiral of silence as a base, we test several theoretical modifications to the spiral of silence model using data gathered from people living in or near six national parks in Canada. Primary interest is on the ability of opinion thresholds, social group and weighing of others' opinions to predict the expression of opinion for particular issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
M. Wojcieszak and V. Price
What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2009; 21(1): 25 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Opin QHome page
M. Wojcieszak
False Consensus Goes Online: Impact of Ideologically Homogeneous Groups on False Consensus
Public Opin Q, December 1, 2008; 72(4): 781 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GazetteHome page
A. T. Spencer and S. M. Croucher
Basque Nationalism and the Spiral of Silence: An Analysis of Public Perceptions of ETA in Spain and France
International Communication Gazette, April 1, 2008; 70(2): 137 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
S. S. Ho and D. M. McLeod
Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication
Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 190 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
K. Neuwirth and E. Frederick
Peer and Social Influence on Opinion Expression: Combining the Theories of Planned Behavior and the Spiral of Silence
Communication Research, December 1, 2004; 31(6): 669 - 703.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
D. A. SCHEUFELE, J. SHANAHAN, and E. LEE
Real Talk: Manipulating the Dependent Variable in Spiral of Silence Research
Communication Research, June 1, 2001; 28(3): 304 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
D. G. McDONALD, C. J. GLYNN, S.-H. KIM, and R. E. OSTMAN
The Spiral of Silence in the 1948 Presidential Election
Communication Research, April 1, 2001; 28(2): 139 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.