| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1996 World Association for Public Opinion Research
FOR THE GOOD OF OTHERS: CENSORSHIP AND THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT
Abstract
The third person effect hypothesis, which states that individuals exposed to a mass media messaage will expect the communication to have a greater effect on others than on themselves, may help to explain the growing trend in support of media censorship. It is suggested here that overestimating the effect of media on others may play an important role in the forces underlying a willingness to restrict various types of communication. To examine this relationship, this study focused on the discrepancy between perceived media effects on others and self, and its relation to pro-censorship attitudes within three major topics: the media in general, violence on television, and pornography. The results of this study support the existence of the third-person effect in mass communication. The findings also indicate that as the gap between perceived firstand third-person effects increases, individuals are more likely to manifest pro-censorship attitudes. This relationship remained for all three topics even when a variety of potentially confounding demographic, media use, and attitudinal variables were controlled. The data also suggest that for pornography the effects gap is related to a willingness to act in favor of censoring.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Xu and W. J. Gonzenbach Does a Perceptual Discrepancy Lead to Action? A Meta-analysis of the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2008; 20(3): 375 - 385. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Cohen and G. Weimann Who's Afraid of Reality Shows?: Exploring the Effects of Perceived Influence of Reality Shows and the Concern Over Their Social Effects on Willingness to Censor Communication Research, June 1, 2008; 35(3): 382 - 397. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ye Sun, Lijiang Shen, and Zhongdang Pan On the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person Effect Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 257 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ran Wei, V.-H. Lo, and H.-Y. Lu Reconsidering the Relationship Between the Third-Person Perception and Optimistic Bias Communication Research, December 1, 2007; 34(6): 665 - 684. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. V. Shah, D. M. McLeod, E. Kim, Sun Young Lee, M. R. Gotlieb, S. S. Ho, and H. Breivik Political Consumerism: How Communication and Consumption Orientations Drive "Lifestyle Politics" The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2007; 611(1): 217 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V.-h. Lo and R. Wei Perceptual Differences in Assessing the Harm of Patronizing Adult Entertainment Clubs Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2006; 18(4): 475 - 487. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-J. Paek, Z. Pan, Y. Sun, J. Abisaid, and D. Houden The Third-Person Perception as Social Judgment: An Exploration of Social Distance and Uncertainty in Perceived Effects of Political Attack Ads Communication Research, April 1, 2005; 32(2): 143 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Huh, D. E. Delorme, and L. N. Reid The Third-Person Effect and its Influence on Behavioral Outcomes in a Product Advertising Context:: The Case of Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertising Communication Research, October 1, 2004; 31(5): 568 - 599. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Chia, K.-H. Lu, and D. M. McLeod Sex, Lies, and Video Compact Disc: A Case Study on Third-Person Perception and Motivations for Media Censorship Communication Research, February 1, 2004; 31(1): 109 - 130. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. HENRIKSEN and J. A. FLORA Third-Person Perception and Children: Perceived Impact of Pro- and Anti-Smoking Ads Communication Research, December 1, 1999; 26(6): 643 - 665. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. HOFFNER, M. BUCHANAN, J. D. ANDERSON, L. A. HUBBS, S. K. KAMIGAKI, L. KOWALCZYK, A. PASTOREK, R. S. PLOTKIN, and K. J. SILBERG Support for Censorship of Television Violence: The Role of the Third-Person Effect and News Exposure Communication Research, December 1, 1999; 26(6): 726 - 742. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. P. EVELAND JR., A. I. NATHANSON, B. H. DETENBER, and D. M. McLEOD Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary: Perceived Likelihood of Expsoure and the Third-Person Perception Communication Research, June 1, 1999; 26(3): 275 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. V. SHAH, R. J. FABER, and S. YOUN Susceptibility and Severity: Perceptual Dimensions Underlying the Third-Person Effect Communication Research, April 1, 1999; 26(2): 240 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. C. GUNTHER The Persuasive Press Inference: Effects of Mass Media on Perceived Public Opinion Communication Research, October 1, 1998; 25(5): 486 - 504. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B. SALWEN Perceptions of Media Influence and Support for Censorship: The Third-Person Effect in the 1996 Presidential Election Communication Research, June 1, 1998; 25(3): 259 - 285. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. McLEOD, W. P. EVELAND Jr., and A. I. NATHANSON Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics: An Analysis of the Third-Person Effect Communication Research, April 1, 1997; 24(2): 153 - 174. [Abstract]
|
|