Skip Navigation


International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access originally published online on March 13, 2006
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2007 19(1):5-23; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/1/5    most recent
edl004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

Gender Attitudes and Modernization Processes

Johannes Bergh

Address correspondence to Johannes Bergh, Institute for Social Research, P.O. Box 3233, Elisenberg, 0208 Oslo, Norway, e-mail: johannes.bergh{at}socialresearch.no

The article aims to explain why attitudes toward gender equality and gender relations in society vary between individuals and countries. The hypotheses that are tested stem from two partly conflicting theories of modernization. Wilensky (2002) advocates a ‘structural’ explanation for variation in gender attitudes, while Inglehart (1990, 1997) suggests a ‘values’ explanation. The author conducts a three-part analysis: an individual, a national, and a multilevel analysis. The structural explanation is better able to account for individual level gender attitudes. Values do, to some extent, serve as the mechanism that produces national level variation. Inglehart (1990, 1997) is also right in suggesting that the effect of values on gender attitudes increases with increasing development.

Received for publication August 30, 2005. Revision received December 10, 2005.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.