Skip Navigation


International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2007
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2007 19(3):401-404; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/401    most recent
edm020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mortimore, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research

Compiled by Roger Mortimore

Ipsos MORI

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

In this section the International Journal of Public Opinion Research reviews articles that have recently been published in peer-refereed journals and which broadly relate to the field of public opinion. The intention is not to give an exhaustive overview of a given study but rather to alert our readers to interesting ideas and research in our field.


    Blais, André & Gélineau, François (2007). Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies, 55, 425–441.
 
Blais and Gélineau use the 1997 Canadian federal election panel study to explore the relationship between supporting the winning side in an election and satisfaction with democracy. While it is well established that winners tend to have higher levels of satisfaction than losers, less research has been done to determine whether it is the election result in itself that causes this difference in satisfaction. The authors theorize that in a parliamentary system voters might gain different utility from winning at the local and national levels, and that their expectations as well as . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Clark, Robert G., & Steel, David G. (2007). Sampling within households in household surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), 170, 63–82.
 

    Coelho, Pedro S., & Esteves, Susana P. (2007). The choice between a five-point and a ten-point scale in the framework of customer satisfaction measurement. International Journal of Market Research, 49, 313–339.
 

    Duff, Brian, Hanmer, Michael J., Park, Won-Ho, & White, Ismail K. (2007). Good excuses: Understanding who votes with an improved turnout question. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 67–90.
 

    Mattes, Robert & Bratton, Michael (2007). Learning about democracy in Africa: Awareness, performance, and experience. American Journal of Political Science 51, 192–217.
 

    Scheufele, Dietram A., & Tewksbury, David (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57, 9–20.
 

    Tourangeau, Roger, Couper, Mick P. & Conrad, Frederick (2007). Color, labels, and interpretive heuristics for response scales. Public Opinion Quarterly 71, 91–112.
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?