Skip Navigation


International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access originally published online on November 23, 2006
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2007 19(2):258-268; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/258    most recent
edl028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heerwegh, D.
Right arrow Articles by Loosveldt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

Personalizing E-mail Contacts: Its Influence on Web Survey Response Rate and Social Desirability Response Bias

Dirk Heerwegh and Geert Loosveldt

Address correspondence to Dirk Heerwegh, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Center for Sociological Research (CESO), E. Van Evenstraat 2B, 3000 Leuven, Belgium, dirk.heerwegh@soc.kuleuven.be

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Previous studies (Pearson & Levine, 2003; Joinson & Reips, 2004; Heerwegh, Vanhove, Matthijs, & Loosveldt, 2005; Heerwegh, 2005) showed that personalization improves response to web surveys, but concerns have been raised and subtle indications have been found suggesting that personalization might result in more socially desirable responses (Heerwegh et al., 2005; Heerwegh, 2005; Joinson, Woodley, & Reips, 2007). The current study provides a stronger test of the hypothesis that personalization would induce social desirability bias, and secondarily provides an additional test of the effect of personalization on web survey response rates. The study relies on a larger number of survey questions potentially under the influence of social desirability bias than previous research. Moreover, to circumvent some problems encountered in previous research with identifying the socially desirable responses, the current study includes a mixed mode experiment.


    EFFECT OF PERSONALIZATION ON RESPONSE BEHAVIOR
 
Apart from a positive effect on the web . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    STUDY DESIGN
 

    RESULTS
 
SURVEY RESPONSE
IDENTIFICATION OF SUITABLE SURVEY QUESTIONS AND OF THE SOCIALLY DESIRABLE RESPONSES
DETECTING SOCIAL DESIRABILITY RESPONSE BIAS DUE TO PERSONALIZATION OF E-MAIL CONTACTS

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
 

    APPENDIX: WORDING OF QUESTIONS MEASURING ATTITUDES TO IMMIGRANTS AND ASYLUM SEEKERS
 
ATTITUDE TOWARD IMMIGRANTS
ATTITUDE TOWARD ASYLUM SEEKERS

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?