Skip Navigation

International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2007 19(1):136-140; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mortimore, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research

Compiled by Roger Mortimore

Ipsos MORI

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this section the International Journal of Public Opinion Research reviews articles that have recently been published in peer-refereed journals and which broadly relate to the field of public opinion. The intention is not to give an exhaustive overview of a given study but rather to alert our readers to interesting ideas and research in our field. For this issue thanks are due to Bruce Hardy (University of Pennsylvania) for help in compiling the reviews.

Butt, Sarah (2006). How voters evaluate economic competence: A comparison between parties in and out of power. Political Studies, 54, 743–766

If voters are to judge between competing parties on the basis of competence, as many apparently do in British general elections, how are they to form their evaluations? While the incumbent government might be judged on their record in office, comparable information is not available for their opponents. After a review of the existing literature and discussion of some hypotheses, Butt uses pre-election interviews from the British Election Panel Studies to model the process by . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Campbell, David E. (2006). Religious ‘threat’ in contemporary Presidential elections. Journal of Politics, 68, 104–115

Caprara, Gian Vittorio, Schwartz, Shalom, Capanna, Cristina, Vecchione, Michele & Barbaranelli, Claudio (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28

Eveland, William P., Jr., & Thomson, Tiffany (2006). Is it talking, thinking, or both? A lagged dependent variable model of discussion effects on political knowledge. Journal of Communication, 56 (3), 523–542

Guibernau, Montserrat (2006). National identity, devolution and secession in Canada, Britain and Spain. Nations and Nationalism, 12, 51–76

Katz, Elihu (2006). Rediscovering Gabriel Tarde. Political Communication, 23, 263–270

Moskalenko, Sophia, McCauley, Clark & Rozin, Paul (2006). Group identification under conditions of threat: College students’ attachment to country, family, ethnicity, religion, and university before and after September 11, 2001. Political Psychology, 27, 77–97

Wright, Scott (2006). Government-run online discussion fora: Moderation, censorship and the shadow of control. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8, 550–568


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?