Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt-Beck, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 World Association for Public Opinion Research

MASS MEDIA, THE ELECTORATE, AND THE BANDWAGON. A STUDY OF COMMUNICATION EFFECTS ON VOTE CHOICE IN GERMANY

Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Mannheim. He has researched and published on political communication, electoral behavior, political value change, social movements and political participation.

Abstract

The paper addresses two propositions: (1) that by publishing news stories about the electoral strength of parties or candidates, the mass media contribute to shaping the voters' expectations about the likely outcome of an upcoming election; (2) that these expectations in turn stimulate a bandwagon effect, i.e. they influence vote choice to the advantage of the apparent future winner of the election. Analyzing media content and survey data gathered during the campaign for the first all-German national election of December 2, 1990, it can be shown that (1) interest in the media's political reporting as well as interpersonal political communication contributed significantly to converting voters to the view of the election outcome that was constantly presented by the mass media; (2) this belief in turn caused particularly unsophisticated independent voters to vote for the apparent winner of the election. Referring to the conceptual framework of ‘low information rationality’, this bandwagon effect is interpreted as ‘majority-led proxy voting’. Since public opinion polls play the key role in its definition, the media portrayal of the competing parties' electoral prospects can be assumed to be fairly accurate, so that voters relying on such information in casting their vote are not misled.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
T. Faas, C. Mackenrodt, and R. Schmitt-Beck
Polls that Mattered: Effects of Media Polls on Voters' Coalition Expectations and Party Preferences in the 2005 German Parliamentary Election
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2008; 20(3): 299 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CommunicationHome page
W. Schulz, R. Zeh, and O. Quiring
Voters in a Changing Media Environment: A Data-Based Retrospective on Consequences of Media Change in Germany
European Journal of Communication, March 1, 2005; 20(1): 55 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
New Media SocietyHome page
C. WHITE and J. M. SCHEB II
Impact of Media Messages about the Internet: Internet Anxiety as a Factor in the Adoption Process in the USA
New Media Society, June 1, 2000; 2(2): 181 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.