Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willnat, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 World Association for Public Opinion Research

MASS MEDIA AND POLITICAL OUTSPOKENNESS IN HONG KONG: LINKING THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT AND THE SPIRAL OF SILENCE

Lars Willnat

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of perceptions of the opinions of others on political outspokenness in Hong Kong. Two related theories, the third-person effect and the spiral of silence, are tested in the context of public opinion regarding the Sino-British dispute over Hong Kong's political future. To estimate the potential influence of perceived public opinion on political outspokenness during this political crisis, a representative telephone survey of 660 respondents in Hong Kong was conducted in November 1993.

As hypothesized by the third-person effect, perceptions of the influence of media reports about the Sino-British dispute on others were found to be consistently greater than perceptions of influence on self. Similar to previous findings, respondents with a higher level of education were more likely to believe that the mass media influence others more than themselves. The study also found empirical support for the spiral of silence hypothesis. Politically unconcerned respondents were less willing to voice their political opinions publicly when they perceived the majority opinion not to be on their side. Findings also indicate that the third-person effect indirectly influences the spiral of silence process through its impact on perceptions of public opinion.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. S. Ho and D. M. McLeod
Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication
Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 190 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
C.-k. Cheung, K.-k. Leung, W.-t. Chan, S. K. Ma, and R. M.-h. Ngan
Self-Expressive Orientation and Willingness to Pay Taxes and Public Fees in Hong Kong
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2006; 18(1): 107 - 118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
D. A. SCHEUFELE, J. SHANAHAN, and E. LEE
Real Talk: Manipulating the Dependent Variable in Spiral of Silence Research
Communication Research, June 1, 2001; 28(3): 304 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
D. G. McDONALD, C. J. GLYNN, S.-H. KIM, and R. E. OSTMAN
The Spiral of Silence in the 1948 Presidential Election
Communication Research, April 1, 2001; 28(2): 139 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
W. PEISER and J. PETER
Explaining Individual Differences in Third-Person Perception: A Limits / Possibilities Perspective
Communication Research, April 1, 2001; 28(2): 156 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
J. R. CHAPIN
Third-Person Perception and Optimistic Bias Among Urban Minority At-Risk Youth
Communication Research, February 1, 2000; 27(1): 51 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
M. B. SALWEN and M. DUPAGNE
The Third-Person Effect: Perceptions of the Media's Influence and Immoral Consequences
Communication Research, October 1, 1999; 26(5): 523 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
D. V. SHAH, R. J. FABER, and S. YOUN
Susceptibility and Severity: Perceptual Dimensions Underlying the Third-Person Effect
Communication Research, April 1, 1999; 26(2): 240 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
M. B. SALWEN
Perceptions of Media Influence and Support for Censorship: The Third-Person Effect in the 1996 Presidential Election
Communication Research, June 1, 1998; 25(3): 259 - 285.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.