Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bean, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 World Association for Public Opinion Research

CONSERVATIVE CYNICISM: POLITICAL CULTURE IN AUSTRALIA*

Clive Bean

Abstract

Though not without its critics, the concept of political culture is potentially of much value in aiding the explanation of political processes and behavior. Unfortunately, however, basic data on political culture remains scarce for many countries, Australia among them. Although there is a good deal of impressionistic literature outlining the contours of the Australian political culture, broadly defined, very little systematic evidence has been adduced to test the many assertions made in these writings. This paper injects some empirical substance into the argument. Using the Australian National Social Science Survey 1984–87 panel, based on a nationwide sample of 1311 respondents, it presents evidence on five dimensions of mass political culture in Australia, namely, attitudes towards reliance on government, the responsiveness of government, citizen duty, authoritarianism and federalism. In addition to outlining the basic distributions of public opinion on these dimensions, the paper uses multivariate analysis to investigate both the causes and consequences of these attitudes.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
L. Cox
The Antipodean social laboratory, labour and the transformation of the welfare state
Journal of Sociology, June 1, 2006; 42(2): 107 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.