Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, C.
Right arrow Articles by Felen, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 World Association for Public Opinion Research

CATHOLICISM AND OPPOSITION TO GENDER EQUALITY IN WESTERN EUROPE

Clyde Wilcox and Ted G. Felen

Abstract

A number of scholars have argued that Catholicism is a barrier to gender equality in western Europe. The explanations for this relationship have usually focused on historical events and trends, which should result in a contextual effect, and on current church doctrine, which should affect individual level attitudes. In this paper, we test the importance of the individual and contextual effects of Catholicism. We find individual Catholics are less supportive of gender equality than non-Catholics. Once we control for individual religious affiliation, however, we find that those in predominantly Catholic countries are more egalitarian than those in predominantly Protestant ones. We conclude that this unusual result is due to the effects of minority religious status—Protestants in predominantly Catholic countries are more egalitarian than Protestants in Protestant countries, and Catholics in Protestant countries are less egalitarian than those in Catholic countries.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
J. Gerhards, M. S. Schafer, and S. Kampfer
Gender Equality in the European Union: The EU Script and its Support by European Citizens
Sociology, June 1, 2009; 43(3): 515 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.