Skip Navigation


International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2007
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2007 19(4):434-450; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/434    most recent
edm028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wanta, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kalyango, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

Terrorism and Africa: A Study of Agenda Building in the United States

Wayne Wanta and Yusuf Kalyango, Jr

Address correspondence to Wayne Wanta, School of Journalism, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211-1200, USA, wantaw{at}missouri.edu

An agenda-building model was examined for the question of Africa and terrorism. A path analysis compared real-world events (deaths and attacks attributed to terrorism), presidential emphasis, media coverage, and foreign aid for 20 African nations. Results show a clear agenda-building trend—when nations were emphasized with a terrorism frame. Presidential emphasis of nations’ involvement in terrorism influenced media coverage and the policy agenda. The findings also suggest that deaths attributed to terrorism influenced the news and policy agendas. Media coverage of nations with a terrorism frame influenced the policy agenda. Only one significant path coefficient was found in the analysis of agenda setting without terrorism framing: The more President Bush mentioned a nation in his public statements, the more The New York Times covered the country.

Received for publication September 29, 2006. Accepted for publication March 27, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
J. Lim and H. Seo
Frame Flow between Government and the News Media and its Effects on the Public: Framing of North Korea
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 204 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
J. Matthes
Need for Orientation as a Predictor of Agenda-Setting Effects: Causal Evidence from a Two-Wave Panel Study
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2008; 20(4): 440 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.