Skip Navigation


International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access originally published online on May 4, 2007
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2007 19(3):313-330; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/313    most recent
edm011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chia, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Koh, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

Personal Bias or Government Bias? Testing the Hostile Media Effect in a Regulated Press System

Stella C. Chia, Shing Yew Joel Yong, Zi Wen Diana Wong and Wei Ling Koh

Address correspondence to Dr. Stella C. Chia, School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, 31 Nanyang Link, Singapore, 637718, tcychia{at}ntu.edu.sg

This study examines the hostile media effect in relation to partisans’ perception of the slant of news coverage in a highly regulated press environment—Singapore. We found that partisans in Singapore perceived unbiased news to be in favor of the other side, while the nonpartisans perceived the same news to be neutral. Our findings show that hostile media effects can persist in a restricted press environment where people are aware of the government's control of media coverage. We also found that partisans’ awareness of the government's control of media information contributed to their perception of the article slant as well.

Received for publication May 9, 2006. Accepted for publication December 5, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.