Skip Navigation


International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access originally published online on July 29, 2007
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2007 19(3):287-312; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/287    most recent
edm014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

The Role of Communication in Public Opinion Processes: Understanding the Impacts of Intrapersonal, Media, and Social Filters

Lindsay H. Hoffman, Carroll J. Glynn, Michael E. Huge, Rebecca Border Sietman and Tiffany Thomson

Address correspondence to Carroll Glynn, School of Communication, 3016B Derby Hall, 154 N. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH, 43210 USA, glynn.14{at}osu.edu

This study examined multiple factors associated with the process of public opinion including relevant predispositions, media use, interpersonal discussion, and perceptions of community opinion in order to test a theoretical model of public opinion. We conceptualized these factors as intrapersonal, media, and social ‘filters’ within the public opinion process. To test the impact of these filters, we conducted a survey with two independent samples—the first sample was collected during the introduction phase of a community ballot issue and the second just a week before the issue vote. Findings indicate all three filters impacted public opinion regarding the ballot issue. Within these filters, important subprocesses were analyzed to better understand each filter's contribution to the formation of public opinion. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression equations used to test the proposed process model revealed that the intrapersonal filter accounted for a substantial amount of the overall variance in public opinion, but that media and social filters were also important predictors. Results highlight the importance of communication variables in the formation of public opinion.

Received for publication May 4, 2006. Accepted for publication April 19, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
A. R. Binder, K. E. Dalrymple, D. Brossard, and D. A. Scheufele
The Soul of a Polarized Democracy: Testing Theoretical Linkages Between Talk and Attitude Extremity During the 2004 Presidential Election
Communication Research, June 1, 2009; 36(3): 315 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
M. Wojcieszak and V. Price
What Underlies the False Consensus Effect? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Perception of Public Opinion
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2009; 21(1): 25 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.