Skip Navigation


International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access originally published online on April 1, 2005
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2006 18(1):67-88; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/1/67    most recent
edh079v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDevitt, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Public Opinion Research Vol. 18 No. 1 © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

The Partisan Child: Developmental Provocation as a Model of Political Socialization

Michael McDevitt

Michael McDevitt is an assistant professor in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He conducts research in the areas of political communication, political socialization, and journalism sociology.

Address correspondence to Michael McDevitt, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, 1511 University Avenue, 478 UCB, Boulder, Colorado 80309–0478, USA, E-mail: michael.mcdevitt{at}colorado.edu

While recent research highlights the child’s active role in her own political socialization, this study represents the first test of the premise that political identification proceeds as adolescents prompt feedback from parents. I propose a model of developmental provocation in which adolescents’ interest in an election campaign, once stimulated by news media use, motivates them to engage parents in political conversations. By initiating discussion, adolescents can generate information from parents as a basis for comparison, contrast, reflection, and debate—all of these activities might foster party and ideological identity. Results from survey panel data support the model. The field setting is Lubbock, Texas, during the final weeks of the 2000 presidential campaign. The stunning aftermath of the election, including the dispute over ballot recounts in Florida, provided a unique opportunity to examine political socialization. Child-initiated discussion generated both parental encouragement and defensive admonitions, reflecting structural changes in family communication patterns. Despite controls for demographics and parent-initiated discussion, child-initiated conversation and the resulting feedback predicted an increase in the likelihood that an adolescent would adopt a political identity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.