Skip Navigation


International Journal of Public Opinion Research Advance Access originally published online on February 17, 2005
International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2005 17(3):324-345; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh065
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/324    most recent
edh065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Public Opinion Research Vol. 17 No. 3 © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

A Cross-Cultural Test of the Spiral of Silence

Huiping Huang

Huiping Huang is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Adult & Continuing Education-Journalism Program at National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Address correspondence to Huiping Huang, Department of Adult & Continuing Education, Journalism Program, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Sec. 1, Ho-Ping E. Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan, R. O. C., E-mail: t06019{at}cc.ntnu.edu.tw

This study tests the spiral of silence theory from a cross-cultural perspective. It explores the effects of cultural conditions, particularly the dimension of individualism/collectivism, and the effects of individual motives on opinion expression by drawing two probability samples from the United States and Taiwan, two countries with different scores on individualism/collectivism. While the more individualistic culture of the United States is characterized by a subordination of collective goals to personal goals, the more collectivistic culture of Taiwan is characterized by an emphasis on collective coping. Results show that an incongruency between one’s own and the perceived future majority opinion and a lack of efficacy both reduce Taiwanese people’s willingness to express their opinions. For Americans, it is only motives for not expressing opinions, including lack of efficacy and issue disorientation, that make them less willing to express their views. Fear of isolation does not predict individual opinion expression in either sample. The findings indicate that the spiral of silence theory receives support in the collectivistic culture of Taiwan, but not in the individualistic culture of the United States. Furthermore, when Taiwanese are in the minority, they may withhold their opinions in order to maintain collective harmony rather than doing so out of a fear of isolation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
J. Coakley
Militant Nationalist Electoral Support: A Measurement Dilemma
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2008; 20(2): 224 - 236.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GazetteHome page
A. T. Spencer and S. M. Croucher
Basque Nationalism and the Spiral of Silence: An Analysis of Public Perceptions of ETA in Spain and France
International Communication Gazette, April 1, 2008; 70(2): 137 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
S. S. Ho and D. M. McLeod
Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication
Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 190 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.