| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Further Article |
The Competition for Worldviews: Values, Information, and Public Support for Stem Cell Research
Matthew C. Nisbet (Ph.D., Cornell University) is Assistant Professor in the School of Communication at The Ohio State University.
Address correspondence to Matthew C. Nisbet, School of Communication, The Ohio State University, 3084 Derby Hall, 154 N. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43215, USA, e-mail: Nisbet.4{at}osu.edu
When it comes to public opinion about controversial issues related to science and technology, many policy makers and scientists assume that increased public understanding of science will lead to increased public support. Yet, instead of a fully informed and deliberative public, past research indicates that it is more likely that the public by nature is ‘miserly’, with individuals relying on their value predispositions and only the information most readily available to them from the mass media and other sources in order to formulate an opinion about science controversy. Building on this latter ‘accessibility’ or ‘memory-based’ model of opinion formation, this study tests the relationship between an increase in available information—or increasing ‘awareness’—and public support for embryonic stem cell research. An analysis of national survey data collected in the USA during the fall of 2001 and the fall of 2002 indicates that although an increase in awareness leads to an increase in support for research, both religious and ideological value predispositions strongly moderate the impact of awareness.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. O. Stewart, D. L. Dickerson, and R. Hotchkiss Beliefs About Science and News Frames in Audience Evaluations of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cell Research Science Communication, June 1, 2009; 30(4): 427 - 452. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V.L. Peddie, M. Porter, C. Counsell, L. Caie, D. Pearson, and S. Bhattacharya 'Not taken in by media hype': how potential donors, recipients and members of the general public perceive stem cell research Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1106 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. B. Becker and D. A. Scheufele Moral Politicking: Public Attitudes toward Gay Marriage in an Election Context International Journal of Press/Politics, April 1, 2009; 14(2): 186 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N.-J. Lee, D. M. McLeod, and D. V. Shah Framing Policy Debates: Issue Dualism, Journalistic Frames, and Opinions on Controversial Policy Issues Communication Research, October 1, 2008; 35(5): 695 - 718. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Pardo and F. Calvo Attitudes Toward Embryo Research, Worldviews, and the Moral Status of the Embryo Frame Science Communication, September 1, 2008; 30(1): 8 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S. Ho, D. Brossard, and D. A. Scheufele Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2008; 20(2): 171 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. Nisbet and R. K. Goidel Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic survey research divide Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 421 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. P. Peters, J. T. Lang, M. Sawicka, and W. K. Hallman Culture and Technological Innovation: Impact of Institutional Trust and Appreciation of Nature on Attitudes towards Food Biotechnology in the USA and Germany Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2007; 19(2): 191 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Brossard and M. C. Nisbet Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2007; 19(1): 24 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-J. Lee, D. A. Scheufele, and B. V. Lewenstein Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies: Examining the Interactive Effects of Cognitions and Affect on Public Attitudes toward Nanotechnology Science Communication, December 1, 2005; 27(2): 240 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|