| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section: Biotechnology and Media Effects |
Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy
Martin W. Bauer is a faculty member of the London School of Economics Social Psychology Department and the Methodology Institute, and associated to the LSE BIOS centre.
Address correspondence to Martin W. Bauer, London School of Economics, Institute of Social Psychology, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom, e-mail: M.Bauer{at}lse.ac.uk
Biotechnology is a strategic technology of the twenty-first century. In the 1990s this modern technology entered the stage of acute political controversy across Europe. In many societies, the public sphere plays an increasingly important role in the development of a new technology. In this debate the role of the mass media is more often subject to polemics than empirical analysis. This section of the special issue of IJPOR puts three hypotheses, which specify the influence of mass media on public perceptions, to empirical test on the topic of modern biotechnology and genetic engineering. These are the quantity of coverage, knowledge gap, and cultivation hypotheses. Our project database, which comprises an analysis of media coverage of biotechnology from 1973 to 1999 and surveys of public perceptions of biotechnology in 1996 and 1999 across 12 European countries, offers important observations on the dynamics of this controversy across Europe and allows us to examine the evidence for media effects in a comparative and longitudinal design.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. W. Bauer Social Influence by Artefacts Diogenes, February 1, 2008; 55(1): 68 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rupar Newspapers' production of common sense: The `greenie madness' or why should we read editorials? Journalism, October 1, 2007; 8(5): 591 - 610. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Nisbet and R. K. Goidel Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic survey research divide Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 421 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Brossard and M. C. Nisbet Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2007; 19(1): 24 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



