Skip Navigation

International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2005 17(1):5-22; doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh054
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Public Opinion Research Vol. 17 No. 1 © World Association for Public Opinion Research 2005; all rights reserved

Section: Biotechnology and Media Effects

Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy

Martin W. Bauer

Martin W. Bauer is a faculty member of the London School of Economic’s Social Psychology Department and the Methodology Institute, and associated to the LSE BIOS centre.

Address correspondence to Martin W. Bauer, London School of Economics, Institute of Social Psychology, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom, e-mail: M.Bauer{at}lse.ac.uk

Biotechnology is a strategic technology of the twenty-first century. In the 1990s this modern technology entered the stage of acute political controversy across Europe. In many societies, the public sphere plays an increasingly important role in the development of a new technology. In this debate the role of the mass media is more often subject to polemics than empirical analysis. This section of the special issue of IJPOR puts three hypotheses, which specify the influence of mass media on public perceptions, to empirical test on the topic of modern biotechnology and genetic engineering. These are the quantity of coverage, knowledge gap, and cultivation hypotheses. Our project database, which comprises an analysis of media coverage of biotechnology from 1973 to 1999 and surveys of public perceptions of biotechnology in 1996 and 1999 across 12 European countries, offers important observations on the dynamics of this controversy across Europe and allows us to examine the evidence for media effects in a comparative and longitudinal design.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiogenesHome page
M. W. Bauer
Social Influence by Artefacts
Diogenes, February 1, 2008; 55(1): 68 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JournalismHome page
V. Rupar
Newspapers' production of common sense: The `greenie madness' or why should we read editorials?
Journalism, October 1, 2007; 8(5): 591 - 610.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. C. Nisbet and R. K. Goidel
Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic survey research divide
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 421 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Public Opin ResHome page
D. Brossard and M. C. Nisbet
Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., March 1, 2007; 19(1): 24 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.