Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leal, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15:134-150 (2003)
© 2003 World Association for Public Opinion Research

Democratization and the Ghost of Zapata: Mexico from 1959 to 1991

David L. Leal

David L. Leal is an assistant professor of government at The University of Texas at Austin.

Address correspondence to Professor David L. Leal, Department of Government, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA, E-mail: dleal{at}gov.utexas.edu

This paper investigates a class-based explanation for recent movement toward democratization in Mexico. By comparing public opinion polls taken in 1959 and 1991, it finds an increased acceptance of democratization among higher socio-economic status (SES) respondents. In 1959, higher SES Mexicans expressed a greater fear of the consequences of opposition party governance than did lower SES Mexicans, an effect that disappeared by 1991. In light of the long-standing Mexican fear of political and social instability, and the claim of the former ruling party (the PRI) as the guarantor of stability, this paper discusses how this attitudinal change may have played a role in facilitating democratic reform.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.