Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yanovitzky, I.
Right arrow Articles by Cappella, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Public Opinion Research 13:377-397 (2001)
© 2001 World Association for Public Opinion Research

Effect of Call-In Political Talk Radio Shows on Their Audiences: Evidence from a Multi-Wave Panel Analysis

Itzhak Yanovitzky and Joseph N. Cappella

Department of Communication, School of Communication, Information & Library Studies, Rutgers University, 4 Huntington Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901–1071, USA, iy{at}scils.rutgers.edu
The Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania

This article examines the effect of political talk radio (PTR) shows on listeners' political attitudes during the 1996 presidential election in the United States. Two complementary approaches for analyzing panel data (cross-lagged correlations and a fixed-effects conditional logit model) were employed to answer the question of whether the messages of PTR influence the audience or whether the audience is merely selecting sources consistent with its pre-existing political biases. In this context, the current study compares the usefulness of media exposure, on one hand, and political knowledge, on the other, as a tool for uncovering media effects on political attitudes. Three major conclusions result from the panel analyses. First is that the impact of PTR on political attitudes over time is very small at best. Second, when there is evidence of causal association between attitudes toward political figures and media reception, the direction of effect is from attitudes to reception (measured either by PTR exposure or political knowledge). Third, using political knowledge as a surrogate for media reception, instead of simple exposure, did not improve the number or magnitude of the observed associations between PTR messages and attitudes toward political leaders.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
R. L. Holbert
Political Talk Radio, Perceived Fairness, and the Establishment of President George W. Bush's Political Legitimacy
International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2004; 9(3): 12 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Harvard International Journal of Press/PoliticsHome page
Y. Tsfati
Debating the Debate: The Impact of Exposure to Debate News Coverage and Its Interaction with Exposure to the Actual Debate
International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2003; 8(3): 70 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.