| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1998 World Association for Public Opinion Research
research-article |
A COMPARISON OF MASS ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE WELFARE STATE IN DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONAL REGIMES, 19851990
Clive Bean is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Social Science at Queensland University of Technology. His research interests revolve mainly around the analysis of social and political attitudes and behaviour.
Elim Papadakis is Professor of Modern European Studies at the Australian National University. His main research interests are in the areas of public opinion, as well as in environmental politics, policy, and values.
Correspondence should be addressed to Clive Bean, School of Social Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
This paper examines the validity of predominant assumptions about popular support for the welfare state. These presuppositions include the notion that support for the welfare state varies in different types of regimes (be they liberal or social democratic or conservative), the idea that different social groups (for example, the middle and working classes and the unemployed) have different interests with respect to the welfare state, and the view that political alignments have a strong influence on attitudes to welfare. To investigate these issues we analyze the 1990 International Social Survey Programme Role of Government Survey and compare it to the findings of an analysis we conducted on the 1985 survey. The aim therefore is to examine the relationship between mass attitudes and specific types of welfare state regime and the social and other correlates of mass opinion.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Jaeger United But Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2009; 25(6): 723 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Busemeyer, A. Goerres, and S. Weschle Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: the rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries Journal of European Social Policy, July 1, 2009; 19(3): 195 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nelson An Application of the Estimated Dependent Variable Approach: Trade Union Members' Support for Active Labor Market Policies and Insider-Outsider Politics Int. J. Public Opin. Res., June 1, 2009; 21(2): 224 - 234. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Jaeger Does Left-Right Orientation have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution? Causal Analysis with Cross-sectional Data Using Instrumental Variables Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2008; 20(3): 363 - 374. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Larsen The political logic of labour market reforms and popular images of target groups Journal of European Social Policy, February 1, 2008; 18(1): 50 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Larsen The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2008; 41(2): 145 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Jaeger What Makes People Support Public Responsibility for Welfare Provision: Self-interest or Political Ideology?: A Longitudinal Approach Acta Sociologica, September 1, 2006; 49(3): 321 - 338. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Jaeger Welfare Regimes and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 1, 2006; 22(2): 157 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. NOEL and J.-P. THERIEN Public Opinion and Global Justice Comparative Political Studies, August 1, 2002; 35(6): 631 - 656. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||




